Why are we denying Democracy Action Team?
Hi, I found out about this earlier today, so I'll be cautious before jumping to a conclusion, but why has CCL decided not to allow for a Democracy Action Team?
I thought the action teams were meant to be open ended and allow for people to work on different areas of common interest that intersect with climate, so it's a little discouraging to hear about this from another member. One of our banner mottos is that our solution to climate change is democracy. Not allowing for an action team on that seems contrary both to that core value of improving democracy and to the practice of democracy itself.
I know there has been a lot of debate on what CCL's role should be in the democracy questions following the election. There are probably some people who are supportive and interested in participating and others who are not. Regardless, it seems fine to me to create a space for like-minded CCLers to discuss and share ideas as long as the approaches are nonpartisan. For example, increasing voter turnout is something we have worked on in almost every election.
Anyway, this is only my quick take. I don't have all the details and truthfully don't follow much of the current pro-democracy efforts, which I'm sure are political. I'm mainly advocating for people in my chapter and CCL who want to participate in this because I worry that it can be discouraging for our members when we don't seem open to their initiatives and interests. Maybe there is a way to approach it beyond the context of the current administration, which is the culmination and symptom of many deeper issues in our democracy, like gerrymandering, the electoral college, and money in politics.
Search Forums
Forum help
Select a question below
CCL Community Guidelines
- Discuss, ask and share
- Be respectful
- Respect confidentiality
- Protect privacy
CCL Blog Policy Area Categories
- Price on Carbon
- CBAM
- Clean Energy Permitting Reform
- Healthy Forests
- Building Electrification and Efficiency
