Hi all,
I'm excited to inform you that this amazing op-ed, cowritten by CCL college students Anna Novoselov (SVN/UCLA) and Adrian Rafizadeh (SVS/UPenn), was published in The Mercury News and East Bay Times on Friday, Oct. 6.
Today, two excellent CCL LTEs (posted below) were published in response to the op-ed: Irmgard Flaschka's (SVE) LTE in the East Bay Times and David Coale's (SVN) LTE in The Mercury News.
United climate activists
deserve carbon dividend
Re: “Young voters want a unified U.S. in climate change fight” (Page A6, Oct. 6).
Thank you for publishing this opinion piece. Recently the Bay Area News Group has carried more and more stories of devastating climate events, and it was heartening to hear instead of young people from both political parties working to slow this trend.
Their solution, HR 5744, is a good one, efficiently lowering emissions by letting market forces determine successful alternatives. Over 3,500 economists, of various political persuasions, support carbon pricing, and 45 countries have some kind of pricing scheme in effect already.
More importantly, the EU is implementing Carbon Border Adjustments to their fee in 2026. This would require importers to the EU to pay a levy equivalent to the carbon cost there minus any carbon price paid here. Wouldn’t it be better to keep the money here, where it can be distributed to our population as a carbon cashback? This policy deserves — and needs — our support.
Irmgard Flaschka
Newark
Young citizens must
vote to affect change
Re: “Young voters want a unified U.S. in climate change fight” (Page A6, Oct. 6).
Bravo to Anna Novoselov and Adrian Rafizadeh for their well-written opinion calling for bipartisan support for the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act to address climate change, our greatest threat to life on our planet.
We really need this act and we need the younger generation to get involved. They go on to say, “The future of our (young) generation depends on our political leaders taking action, yet Congress continues to ignore us.” With all their facts and figures, they fail to show that the greatest number of non-voting constituents are in fact their generation.
Search Forums
Forum help
Select a question below
CCL Community Guidelines
- Discuss, ask and share
- Be respectful
- Respect confidentiality
- Protect privacy
CCL Blog Policy Area Categories
- Price on Carbon
- CBAM
- Clean Energy Permitting Reform
- Healthy Forests
- Building Electrification and Efficiency