Sen. Whitehouse-Schatz's Save Our Future Act Provisions To Respect Environmental Justice Concerns

Average Rating:

By Jerry Hinkle, CCL Research Coordinator

b34506cbc6ac4fbc18c1e630e23b5d52-huge-snThe Save Our Future Act (SOFA), introduced in June by Senators Whitehouse and Schatz and summarized here, is a type of carbon fee and dividend (CFD) legislation that includes strong provisions to reduce harmful air pollutants in frontline communities (see page 39 of the bill). It returns significant funds to frontline communities, as well as to American families in general, in order to support economic growth and to offset climate damages. The purpose of this analysis is to explore the potential impact of the bill's Environmental Justice (EJ) provisions.

Any carbon pricing policy is expected to rapidly reduce air pollution in local communities. However, this bill attempts to further address the concern of the disproportionate impact of harmful air pollution on those most vulnerable. Specifically, it places a charge on criteria air pollutants SO2,NOx andPM2.5 when they are emitted from a “major source” within one mile of an Environmental Justice Community. The charges are $18.00, $6.30 and $38.90 per pound of the pollutant, respectively.

According to the EPA, total annual US emissions of SO2 (here), NOx (here) and PM2.5 (here) were 1.96, 8.23, and 5.64 million short tons (2,000 pounds/ton), respectively, in 2020. We do not have estimates at this point as to what proportion of these would be covered by the legislation, but presume here that combined emissions from fuel combustion, industrial processes, and waste management & recycling may serve as a useful proxy for emissions affecting EJ Communities. Of note, SO2 and NOx emissions from power plants have fallen dramatically (93% and 87%, respectively) since an emissions trading program to address acid rain was implemented in 1995. Also, though PM2.5 emissions have fallen almost 40% since 2000, they were still estimated to have caused 13% of US deaths in 2018.

What can we say then about the likely impact of these provisions within the legislation? The table below provides an estimate of the impact should emissions from the above three sources be covered by the SOFA provisions. The 2020 emissions are multiplied by the corresponding fee to yield potential annual revenues of $62 billion, $44 billion and $97 billion for each of the three criteria air pollutants covered.

The EPA has also recently analyzed the value (converted to $2021 per pound, Table 7, page 16) of the health benefit of avoided emissions from these pollutants. The benefits were estimated for each of 17 sources, and their value vary greatly by source in part because the health impact is a function of where the pollution occurs. For this analysis, we averaged the health value across three sources most likely to be covered by the bill: electric generating units, industrial point sources, and refineries.
 

6f2cf008a9fdfcd05b51734ed8fef38e-huge-sn

These health benefit values are listed in the table above, and when multiplied by total emissions, provides the estimated benefit should all US emissions be abated. These values are $328 billion, $90 billion, and $1,173 billion, respectfully.  Not surprisingly, the value of the emission reductions are many multiples of the fees charged.

Though these are only rough estimates of the revenue and benefits from SOFA’s EJ provisions, it is clear that pricing has worked in the past to reduce air pollution, these charges are substantial, and that this approach of making harmful air pollution significantly more expensive will guarantee improved health in EJ communities and generate revenues that can be used to bolster economic growth.

----------------------------------------
Note: For more information and CCL's overall take on the bill see the entry on the Save Our Future Act here on CCL Community's Carbon Pricing Bills in Congress resource.

* “Est. EJ Emissions” Includes emissions from electric generating units, industrial point sources, and refineries only. This amounts to a very rough estimate of what emissions would be covered by the SOFA, and is almost certainly an overestimate. “SOFA” Fee/lb simply reports the fee specified in the legislative text for the covered co-pollutants. “Emissions X Fee” reports the product of estimated EJ emissions and the Fee in millions of dollars. “Health Benefit/lb” reports the EPA estimated health benefit in $2021 per pound. “Emissions X Benefit” reports the product of the estimated EJ emissions and the reported Health Benefit per pound in millions of 2021 dollars.

Posted by Brett Cease on Aug 18, 2021 3:17 AM America/Los_Angeles

Share this

Share:

Recent Posts

September 11, 2024 Since the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024 was introduced in the Senate in late July, we’ve been eagerly awaiting analysis of its expected climate impacts. The most respected voices in climate and energy modeling have been hard at work figuring out those impacts: Resources for the Future, Rocky Mountain Institute, Jesse ... more
Posted by Brett Cease on CCL Community Bulletin Sep 11, 2024 2:46 PM PDT
Each month, Citizens’ Climate Lobby supporters gather locally for a monthly national meeting where we educate ourselves by listening to a guest speaker. Go to your local chapter's page to find out more about your chapter's plans to join our national call. September's Monthly Meeting will be held on Saturday, September 14th at 1:00 pm ET and feature ... more
Posted by T Todd Elvins on CCL Community Bulletin Sep 6, 2024 5:12 PM PDT
September 4, 2024 Wow — Electrification Month sure did spark some inspiration! CCL volunteers blew through our national goal of 3,000 conversations about home electrification, logging 3,408 total conversations by the end of month. These conversations have helped people across the country understand the climate-friendly upgrades available for ... more
Posted by Brett Cease on CCL Community Bulletin Sep 5, 2024 2:35 PM PDT
August 28, 2024 Last week, researchers published a paper in the journal “ Science ” evaluating 1,500 climate policies for their effectiveness. The authors looked at policies that have been implemented in 41 countries over the past 25 years and identified the most successful ones. The study was covered in the Associated Press under the headline: “What ... more
Posted by Brett Cease on CCL Community Bulletin Aug 28, 2024 6:01 PM PDT