What Ways & Means proposed to do to IRA clean energy tax credits

The House Ways & Means Committee's first proposal for the IRA clean energy tax credits (and other items under the committee's purview have now been published (committee markup will come tomorrow). CCL will have more to say about it soon, but here's a quick and dirty summary of what they proposed:

45Y/48E/45U: production & investment tax credits for clean electricity and existing nuclear phase out starting 2029 to zero in 2032. Tax credit transferability is repealed (this was useful for relatively small developers who don't have big tax liability – they could instead transfer the tax credits to big financial institutions, making them easier to take advantage of).

Deadlines are changed from commencing at construction (with 4 year safe harbor) to placed in service. Jesse Jenkins says this is a huge reduction in timeline & big increase in risk for project developers (and “goodbye advanced nuclear industry”)

30D: $7500 new EV tax credit ends 12/31/25 except for vehicles sold by manufacturers who have produced less than 200,000 qualifying vehicles, cumulatively. “That means basically Rivian, Lucid, Slate. Maybe Hyundai or Kia for a hot minute,” says Jesse Jenkins. Those smaller EV companies get an extra year, with the tax credit ending instead on 12/31/26.

25E: $4000 used EV tax credit ends 12/31/25 (was 12/31/32)

45W: $7500 commercial EV tax credit (which also applied to leased EVs) ends 12/31/25

30C: $1000 or 30% residential EV charger tax credit ends 12/31/25 (was 12/31/32)

25C: Home energy efficiency/heat pump tax credits end 12/31/25

25D: 30% rooftop solar & battery tax credit ends 12/31/25 (was 12/31/34)

45L: Up to $5000 new efficient homes tax credit ends 12/31/25 (unless already under construction, in which case it's 12/31/26)

45X: advanced manufacturing tax credit ends 12/31/31 for most technologies, except wind components, for which it ends 12/31/27

45Q: carbon capture tax credit only amended to exclude prohibited foreign entities (which also applies to most other tax credits, including 45Y/48E/45U)

45V: clean hydrogen tax credit ends 1/1/26 (was 1/1/33)

Again, watch for more about this from CCL in the next 24 hours. Quick take is that it could be worse and it could be a lot better.

12 Replies

Emily Pontecorvo also summarized the proposed changes nicely at Heatmap:

@Dana Nuccitelli : Thanks a ton for sharing this quick summary Dana! Our chapter meets tonight and your summary is really helpful for discussion.

I know you said it could've been a lot worse, but my brain can't move past “it could've been a lot better”. Eagerly awaiting upcoming strategy from National on this front.

-Shekhar, Alameda County Chapter

@Dana Nuccitelli Thanks, Dana, for this quick summary. It seems to me the only way this result could have been worse is if they repealed all IRA tax credits immediately. Very disappointing. Looking forward to the CCL legislative staff reading on next steps and whether our chances of turning this around in any way is possible as the reconciliation process progresses.

@Dana Nuccitelli Can this still be changed on the House side? Or is the only point of influence now the Senate? Thank you-Jan

Yes it can @Janice Schaper (although the Senate is the better bet). We'll have more to say about it later today.

Rhodium published a preliminary analysis of the Ways and Means Committee's proposed changes to the IRA clean energy tax credits.

…will raise energy costs for American households by as much as 7% in 2035, stifle energy technology innovation, increase pollution, and could put a meaningful portion of half a trillion dollars of new manufacturing, industrial, and clean electricity investments across the country at risk.

588b163c42eaf8faeeda4615a03ea6a0-huge-sc

You can also see a summary of Ways & Means' proposed changes similar to mine above but in table form from Shuting Pomerleau at the American Action Forum here. Shuting estimates the budgetary savings from the proposed IRA clean energy tax credit changes:

The House Ways and Means Committee’s draft of its reconciliation legislation proposes a significant paring back of about 60 percent of the Inflation Reduction Act energy tax credits, which would raise about $515 billion in revenue from 2025–2034.

The proposal would repeal some energy credits immediately, including all clean vehicle credits, the alternative fuel vehicle refueling property credit, all residential energy efficiency credits, and the clean hydrogen production credit, which would raise approximately $306 billion from 2025–2034.

It would also add phaseouts and restrictions to several credits, including the clean electricity production and investment credits, the clean fuel production credit, carbon sequestration credit, nuclear power production credit, advanced manufacturing production credit, and the credit for certain energy property, which would raise about $210 billion from 2025–2034.

a6238b8274c306b2dc1fe301121c689f-huge-ta

The question before Congress: are those budgetary savings worth raising Americans' monthly energy bills, imperiling tens of thousands of domestic manufacturing jobs, reducing our energy security, and increasing pollution? 🧐

Some good news: a number of Senate Republicans have said that changes are needed to the Ways & Means slashing of the IRA clean energy tax credits. 14 House Republicans wrote a letter requesting changes to the 3 most problematic provisions (relating to foreign entities of concern, transferability, and placed in service date – see Heatmap for details on these).

Most recently, Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski said that this letter is giving Senate Republicans cover to rethink changes to the IRA. And a number of senators have said that changes are needed from the Ways and Means Markup.

A number of House Republicans also say that they're preparing a formal document with their asks regarding changes to the IRA markup but they're "not at the point of making threats."

The challenge is that House Republicans don't yet see the IRA changes as a red line that will decide their votes on the budget reconciliation package as a whole. It's good that they're requesting changes, but Speaker Johnson says “The bill is almost in final form.” So, the Senate is our best bet for preserving more of the IRA.

It's also possible that Congressional Republicans won't be able to agree on an overall budget reconciliation package that can get a majority of votes in both the House and Senate. In fact, as I was writing this, five conservative House Republicans voted against advancing the budget resolution “citing concerns that the legislation to fulfill President Trump’s domestic agenda would add too much to the deficit.”

If the overall budget reconciliation package fails, the IRA would remain largely intact, as Flannery wrote earlier this week:

Another possibility, is that if enough lawmakers are feeling pressure not to support this legislation (whether because of the clean energy tax credits, or Medicaid cuts, etc.), there may not be enough votes to pass the reconciliation bill at all or this process may drag on for months as they work to find a package that has enough support to pass.

If the reconciliation effort falls apart and we get to the end of the year with no deal, there would likely be a push for a bipartisan tax extenders package. It is almost guaranteed that any bipartisan package on the clean energy tax credits would be better than the current reconciliation proposals but we would remain engaged and advocating for their preservation.

@Dana Nuccitelli
Dana, The House Reconciliation Budget will be terrible for our public lands. From what I understand, they are proposing: to sell ~ 500,000 acres of public lands, mostly in Utah around St. George, and in Nevada's high desert around Las Vegas; to institute mandatory logging; to build commercial roads in pristine wilderness; selling lands for oil and gas drilling; rolling back NEPA and most of the Endangered Species Act.

So many Americans love our public lands and national parks for their beauty, for the recreational opportunities they hold, and outdoor activities such as hunting and fishing. All members of Congress should be adverse at rolling back these protections.

As CCL is a bipartisan organization, can we reach out to our members with GOP congress members so they can contact them?

I have already contacted all of and spoken with the majority of the members of the House Natural Resource Committee that proposed the above changes. However I think the voices of our many CCL'ers would be far more impactful.

What are CCL's concerns about this bill and what is CCL doing to let our legislators know about our concerns?

Thank you,

Polly Estabrook

Hi @Polly Estabrook. See Flannery's blog post that I linked above to get CCL's thoughts and concerns. We're focused on the clean energy tax credits to maximize our lobbying efficacy. I'm sure other groups will lobby against the public lands giveaway too.

@Dana Nuccitelli. Wondered what changes happened over the weekend re: clean energy tax credits? Thanks!

@Dana Nuccitelli I don't understand how the tax credits will work if they expire at end of this year. 2025 taxes are done in 2026, no?

We're wondering that too, @Linda Racine! All we know so far is that some tax credit expiration/phaseout date(s) moved up, perhaps from 2029 to 2028 or something like that. We'll know more by late Tue/early Wed when the text comes out.

@Deanville Celestine, if the tax credits phase out by the end of this year, it means that you can still take advantage of the associated tax credits for any qualifying 2025 projects when you file your 2026 taxes.

Forum help

Select a question below

CCL Community's Sitewide Forums are an easy and exciting way to interact with other members on CCL Community.  The Sitewide Forums are focused on subjects and areas of general interest to members.  Each forum consists of topics that members have posted, along with replies from other members. Some forums are divided into categories to group similar topics together. 

Any members can post a topic or reply to a topic.

The Sitewide Forums are open to the entire CCL community to create, comment on, and view online discussions.  Posts and comments should address the subject or focus of the selected forum. 

Note: Categories can only be created by community administrators.

Guidelines for posting: (also see general Community Guidelines)

  • Don’t see your question or topic? Post it.
  • Be thoughtful, considerate (nonpartisan) and complete. The more information you supply, the better the better and more engaging the conversation will be. 
  • Feel like cursing? Please don’t.
  • Ask yourself, “Would my topic post reveal sensitive or confidential information?” If so, please don't post!

Flag/report any offending comments, and then move on. In the rare instance of a comment containing a potentially credible threat, escalate that immediately to CCL.

If the Sitewide Forum has no categories, select the "Add Topic" button at the top of topics window. 

If the forum has categories, when you click on "Add Topic," a dropdown list of the categories appears. Select the desired category and then "Add Topic."
In either case this brings up a box to enter both the topic subject and topic text.

If you have questions or wish to add comments on a posted forum topic, open the post and click the blue “Add Reply” button at top. You can also click on the “Reply” link at the bottom of the original topic posting.

This opens a text box. Add your reply. You can also add documents by dragging a file into the text box. Click “Post” at the bottom of the reply window This will add your reply to other replies (if there are any), sorted by oldest on top. 

If, however, you want to reply directly to someone else’s reply, click on the “Reply” link at the bottom of their reply. 

When replying to a topic post or a topic reply it may be helpful to quote the original text, or the part that your reply is referring to. To quote a topic or reply, click on the "Quote" link at bottom of post. 

When you do this the full text of either the post or reply will be pulled into a reply text box. If desired, you can remove parts of the quoted text in order to get the portion you are interested in quoting.

You can subscribe to notifications of new postings from any of the Sitewide Forums or forum categories. To subscribe, select the green “Subscribe” button at the top of the forum. Click on dropdown arrow to select frequency of notification.

If you are already subscribed, the button will display “Unsubscribe.”  Select it to unsubscribe or select the dropdown arrow to modify frequency of notification. 

Note: If you subscribe to a Sitewide Forum, such as "Media Relations" that has categories (such as "LTEs and Op-Eds"), you will also be subscribed to all the categories. If you wish to subscribe to only one or more of the categories, unsubscribe to the parent forum and subscribe individually to desired categories.

.

If you see a topic post or reply that interests you or that you like, you can click the “Like” icon at the bottom of the topic post or the reply. This lets the poster know that the topic was helpful. It also contributes to the topic’s popularity, which influences where it is listed in the "Popular" forum tab. There are also additional reactions available for members to use. Mouseover the "Like" icon to choose one of these options: Love, Clap, Celebrate, Insightful, or Interesting.

CCL Community Guidelines

  • Discuss, ask and share
  • Be respectful
  • Respect confidentiality
  • Protect privacy

More guidelines
 

CCL Blog Policy Area Categories