My two cents
Hi,
I’ve been working on what I believe to be an effective, business-friendly plan for building clean energy. Here’s what I have so far:
Plan to decarbonize US in a business friendly method
Renewable energy:
- Solar and Wind: Approach Solar and Wind as if they are a stop-gap option. Increase build up, but earmark land for more long term projects (infrastructure (see below) and more reliable renewable energy (also see below)).
- Nuclear Fusion and Hydrogen: Once these energy sources become commercially viable, refit plants to use these energy sources instead of the less reliable energy types they used to be used for.
- Grid Infrastructure: Use earmarked land to buildout grid infrastructure. Incentivize communities to allow needed infrastructure construction with deductions on their energy bills or taxes. To ease financial burden, split US into smaller regions that will be charged with funding the infrastructure that will fund said region.
EVs:
- Incentivize car manufacturers to minimize the number of non-EVs they produce. Find a way to incentivize American’s to buy EVs that requires usage of EVs and minimizes risk of fraud.
- Infrastructure: Approach this in a similar fashion to grid infrastructure. Incentivize construction of EV chargers. All EV chargers must be in monitored by at least 2 concealed security cameras to crackdown on incidents of vandalism or impeding use chargers.
Water:
- Shore up supplies with buildups of desalination and waste water treatment plants.
- Void any water claims that are more than 50 years old.
Agriculture/Livestock:
- Incentivize companies to adhere to pro-climate practices.
- Reduce production of climate hostile crops until the downsides of growing them can be adequately addressed.
- Require livestock farmers to reduce bovine methane.
- Reduce meat production until we can source meat with minimal emissions.
Carbon Capture:
- Once above steps have been implemented and the effect of the technology has been sufficiently scaled up, build up carbon capture to make for emissions that can’t be reduced through conventional means.
Jobs:
- Create a program that will retrain workers in industries that will be threatened by pro-climate policies and train people who want to work in pro-climate industries. Upon completion of said program, the workers will be immediately assigned a position on a pro-climate project. I am unsure as to how this program will be funded as of writing this, though I think it should be a mix of government funding and funding from polluting industries. There will also need to be an incentive to get polluting industries to agree to fund the program and to allow their workers to be retrained.
@Jeremy Zwick
I agree with your priorities, especially realizing that wind and solar are stop gap measures.
You call your proposal business friendly, but it seems to be command and control, not market-based.
How does your thinking align with Carbon Fee and Dividend?
How do you generate the political will from voters?
@Robert Blackburn My thought is this, our climate policies won’t get anywhere unless we provide mechanisms for the opposition to off set financial losses, reduce the financial strain on all levels of government. My dream is to create a system where climate policies can fund themselves using the profits generated from pro-climate projects. We can’t just punish bad behaviors, we must incentivize and reward good behaviors too.
Search Forums
Forum help
Select a question below
CCL Community Guidelines
- Discuss, ask and share
- Be respectful
- Respect confidentiality
- Protect privacy
CCL Blog Policy Area Categories
- Price on Carbon
- CBAM
- Clean Energy Permitting Reform
- Healthy Forests
- Building Electrification and Efficiency