Frequently Raised Topics in Lobby Meetings
- The chart below shows how often the topics listed came up in Congressional lobby meetings in 2019.
- The headings show you how the results break down across each chamber, political party and key committees.
- Red and blue color depth matches the frequency / percent of meetings in which the topic was discussed.
- Red = topic brought up in over 10% of offices.
- Blue = topic not as common and brought up in under 10% of offices.
Frequently Raised Topics Chart
Click on the chart image to link to the 2019 spreadsheet.
The list below organizes these topics in rank order based on their frequency and provides helpful CCL resources and recommendations in preparing for your next meeting.
The Dividend (28%)
CCL hired a former Treasury Department tax expert to explore the details of delivering carbon dividends to households. The process is quite manageable, with low administrative costs, and CCL now has the necessary information to help guide implementation of the policy.
Dividend Delivery Study
- Dividend Delivery Study – Study detailing how the dividend could work.
Related Laser Talks
- Laser Talk: Administrative Cost – Addresses the administrative cost projections.
- Laser Talk: Revenue Neutrality – Addresses revenue neutrality.
International & Border Issues (21%)
Enacting the Energy Innovation Act in the U.S., especially with a Border Carbon Adjustment, will encourage other developed nations to follow suit. Our Border Carbon Adjustment prevents the carbon fee from creating any disadvantage to American businesses in the import/export markets.
Related Laser Talks
Importance of Endorsers (20%)
CCL recognizes the importance of winning the support of business, local governments, faith organizations, and other influential stakeholders in communities across the country.
Green New Deal (20%)
The Green New Deal is a set of goals that was written into a non-binding resolution introduced in House of Representatives in February 2019. CCL is encouraged to see supporters of the Green New Deal raising the urgency of climate change in the media and in the halls of Congress. We share their goal of transitioning away from fossil fuels while creating jobs and boosting the economy.
Laser Talk: CCL & The Green New Deal
CCL believes the best way to make climate change a bridge not a wedge issue is to cosponsor the bipartisan Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act. Americans do not lack for topics that wedge us apart. These days, it’s harder to name topics that unite us. This is too bad, because strong majorities of Americans (78%) say they want elected officials to cooperate across political lines, to be respectful to each other, and to compromise. Bipartisan legislators see real boosts to their reputations from such behavior, as they are perceived as listening to voters, and less self interested. Further, opposite party voters like legislators better when they bridge the partisan divide. It’s time politicians started treating climate as a bridge issue. There are real political benefits to be gained, and the physics of the climate, graphically highlighted in the recent special report on a 1.5 C target from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), make clear that it's time to act.
Another way CCL aims to foster bipartisanship on climate is through our supporting ask bills. CCL has identified a handful of bipartisan climate bills that are complementary to a carbon price. These are great asks for Members of Congress who already cosponsor the Energy Innovation Act or those who aren’t ready to sign on to our bill but are looking for other positive steps to make.
Supporting ask bill summaries and one pagers: Bills supporting bipartisan climate action
Impact on Low-Income Households (18%)
We know that the cost of energy is of great concern to low-income Americans. That’s why we have taken great pains to ensure that the Carbon Fee and Dividend will not impose economic hardship on the most vulnerable among us, and the Household Impact Study we commissioned has independently confirmed that confidence.
- Laser Talk: Impact on Low-Income Households – Addresses the positive impact Carbon Fee and Dividend would have on low-income households.
- Household Impacts Study – find the summary for your district or state.
- REMI figure 3.22 – Total Employment by Quintile
Impact on Jobs (15%)
A 2014 study by Regional Economic Models Inc found that a carbon fee and dividend type policy would grow jobs faster than business as usual – as many as 2.8 million additional jobs in 20 years.
- Endorsements reports by state and congressional district
- Laser Talk: The REMI Study
- Laser Talk: Jobs – Fossil Fuels vs. Clean Energy
- REMI figure 3.6 Total Employment
Carbon Capture Sequestration (14%)
Carbon dioxide (CO2) that is removed from an emissions source and then ‘sequestered’ from the atmosphere doesn’t contribute to global warming or ocean acidification. That’s why the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act offers carbon fee refunds for CO2 captured and sequestered from fossil fuel combustion. Operators of the sequestration sites must guarantee the safety and permanence of their CO2 storage.
Laser Talk: Carbon Capture & Storage
Energy/Consumer Costs (14%)
The Carbon Fee will increase energy costs at the consumer level, but the equal-per-person Carbon Dividend will allow 58 percent of American households to break even or come out ahead. Extra cash every month will help those households, if they choose, to make climate-friendly investments that will put them even further ahead as the Carbon Dividend increases.
- The Energy Innovation & Carbon Dividend Act
- The Economic Impacts of Pricing Carbon
- Household Energy Costs
- Agriculture & The Carbon Fee
REMI Results and Figures
- Power Generation Results
REMI Study, figure 3.19 – Cost of Living (regional)
REMI Study, figure 3.20 – Energy Commodity Prices
REMI Study, figure 3.21 – Cost of Living (quinitile, national)
REMI Study, figure 3.24 – Real Disposable Personal Income (National)
The agricultural sector occupies a unique and irreplaceable role in our society, so we are paying close attention to the impact of a carbon fee and dividend type policy on American farmers and ranchers. While decarbonization will surely offer new opportunities to those businesses in the long term, we will take steps to ensure that short-term costs don’t squeeze their small margins any more than they are now.
People are getting the message that climate change is real and putting a price on carbon is a good way to address it. In March 2018, two universities – Yale and George Mason – issued a report showing that 70 percent of Americans agree global warming is happening, outnumbering those who don’t by 5 to 1. The number who attribute it to human activities has grown from 48 percent in 2014 to 57 percent in 2018, with only 32 percent still attributing it to natural cycles.
On the policy side, Yale’s 2018 survey also showed that 68 percent of Americans favored a revenue-neutral plan to “require fossil fuel companies to pay a carbon tax,” with only 29 percent opposed. That matches a 2014 poll from Stanford, the New York Times, and Resources for the Future which found that requiring companies to pay a greenhouse gas tax and then giving “all this tax money … to all Americans equally” was favored by 67 percent to only 31 percent opposed.
Laser Talk: Public Opinion & Climate Policy
Imposing A Tax (11%)
What’s the difference between a “Fee” and a “Tax?”
A tax has the primary purpose of raising revenue. By contrast, a fee recovers the cost of providing a service from a beneficiary. Since the CCL advocates for revenue-neutrality and a policy that doesn’t grow the government, we are advocating for a fee, not a tax. However, for purposes of discussion you will find carbon tax and carbon fee used interchangeably, and referring to the same type of legislation. This is fine, and don’t let it get in the way of the discussion. The tax or fee do the same thing, which is to include the damage that carbon is doing to our climate, oceans, and health in the price.
Laser Talk: Revenue Neutrality
Regulatory Pause (10%)
Currently, the U.S. does not regulate CO2 emissions under the Clean Power Plan or any other plan for their impacts on the climate. This Energy Innovation Act prevents the EPA from regulating CO2 and equivalent emissions, which are covered by the bill, for 10 years. If emission targets are not being met after 10 years, Congress directs the EPA to regulate those emissions. The bill does not impact regulations on any other pollutants, including auto mileage standards, water quality and more. Bipartisan legislation like the Energy Innovation Act is necessary to ensure long-term success against climate change.
- Laser Talk: The Regulatory Pause
Local Climate Change Impacts (10%)
Climate change is already having real impacts on American communities, such as seawater intrusion, stronger tropical storms, more extreme floods and droughts, and increased wildfire severity.
- Local Impact Tools
- REMI Report Resouces Regional Summaries
- Household Impacts Study – District and State Summaries
Nuclear Energy (10%)
Nuclear energy is controversial, but it is largely carbon-free. CCL believes all technologies must compete honestly by pricing all of their externalities, including greenhouse gases as well as other wastes and public safety needs, into the price of the energy they generate.
Laser Talk: Nuclear Energy
Develop Tech/Innovation (9%)
- Laser Talk: Extreme Weather & Climate Change
Climate and the Military (8%)
- Archived Training: National Security and Climate
Paris Agreement (8%)
- Laser Talk: Paris Agreement
Health & Pollution (8%)
- Laser Talk: Health Benefits of Climate Policy
- Health Co-Benefits By State Of The Energy Innovation Act Resource
Ag Exemption (7%)
- Energy Innovation Act Q&A: Why the special provision for agriculture?
Climate in Hearing (7%)
- CCL’s Call Congress Day
Energy Storage (6%)
- Laser Talk: Renewable Energy
Climate Solutions Caucus (6%)
- Support the Climate Solutions Caucus training page
Ocean Impacts (6%)
Transition Assistance (5%)
Rural Residents (5%)
- Household Impact Study Resource (Figure 5: Impact By Household Type for your district)
State-based Carbon Pricing (5%)
- State Carbon Taxes Action Team
Frontline/Environmental Justice (5%)
- Climate and Environmental Justice Action Team
Renewable Tax Credit (5%)
- Economics Policy Network Action Team